top of page

Reimagining Teacher Evaluation with Evidence-First™ Scoring

  • Dr. Chris Moersch
  • Mar 7
  • 2 min read

Every year, thousands of school districts engage in the teacher evaluation process with the goal of fostering professional growth, ensuring accountability, and improving instructional practices. While many teachers welcome constructive feedback, studies have shown that they often perceive evaluation systems as unfair or inconsistent (Rand Corporation, 2019). The problem? Traditional evaluations rely on rubric-based scoring, where administrators assign a score first and then justify it with evidence—an approach that can introduce bias, create inefficiencies, and shift the focus away from real instructional impact.



A Smarter Approach: Evidence-First™ Scoring

What if evaluations could be faster, fairer, and more effective? With Evidence-First scoring, the evaluation process is reenergized by putting evidence before the score. Here’s how it works:

  1. Evaluators select observable evidence from a structured set of rubric-aligned indicators during classroom observations.

  2. The system assigns scores automatically based on selected evidence, eliminating subjective guesswork.

  3. Comments and feedback auto-populate, ensuring every evaluation is backed by clear, rubric-aligned documentation.

  4. Administrators can provide targeted coaching suggestions, improving the quality of post-observation discussions.


The Impact of Evidence-First™ Scoring in K-12 Schools

  • Reduces evaluation time by half, allowing administrators to focus on supporting teachers rather than justifying scores.

  • Improves fairness and reliability by ensuring that every rating is backed by documented, observable evidence.

  • Automatically generates rubric-aligned feedback so teachers receive clear, actionable insights for growth.

  • Supports evaluation oversight compliance (e.g., NJ QSAC) by ensuring evaluations contain documented evidence and improvement suggestions.


By transitioning from rubric-first to evidence-first, schools can stop debating scores and start focusing on professional growth—turning evaluations into meaningful coaching opportunities.


Join an Evidence-First Q&A Webinar to see how this system is transforming teacher evaluations.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page